June 2007 Newsletter

 

 



10 Prepress Troubleshooting Tips:

How to spot little problems before they become big headaches

  Typically, only about 15% of client-supplied files are actually ready to output without problems. The other 85% have one or more problems - some are minor and hardly noticeable in the final piece; others have more serious problems that will jam your imagesetter or other output device or, worse, produce an unacceptable print job that the client won't pay for. The earlier you find these problems, the better. You can decide who should fix the problems: you, for an additional fee, or the client, and deal with them before you waste materials or miss a delivery date.
  In an earlier column I covered some popular pre-flight software designed to auto-troubleshoot digital prepress files and identify, but not fix, problems. These programs can be real time-savers, but you still need to understand the most common problems and how to fix them to avoid angry clients and wasting time and money. With that in mind, these are the most common prepress problems you will encounter.

 

The problem with fonts


  This is far and away the most common trouble area. Jobs can contain from two to a dozen or more typefaces, and page layout or illustration programs do not automatically include the fonts with files they create. Therefore, it's the client's responsibility to include these fonts with the job so you can temporarily load them to output the files. If the correct fonts are not included, they will be missing or substituted in the output, usually with unfortunate results. This means clients must include the Mac or PC screen and printer font files for all PostScript typefaces used, even if they seem like common fonts. There are over a dozen similar, but not identical, versions of something as common as Times or Helvetica out there, for example.
  For TrueType fonts, just the main font file is required - it includes both screen and printer resources. Although TrueType can be problematic, especially on older imagesetter RIPs. Adobe's Multiple Master fonts can also be a problem - clients must remember to include any special instances of MM fonts used in a job.
  Other fixes? Well, Illustrator and FreeHand can convert all type to outlines in their files - you won't need the font files to output the work, but you will not be able to edit the text. Adobe's excellent Acrobat Distiller can open files from almost any program and convert them to PDF, embedding font resources in the these files, solving the font problem and other potential issues. All you need to print them is a copy of the free Acrobat Reader, although every print shop should own the full Acrobat package - it's a real swiss army knife for graphic arts files.

 

Tricky graphic files


  With the widespread use of low-cost digital cameras and scanners - some are as low as $69, but you get exactly what you pay for - and the availability of powerful image-editing programs like Photoshop, many clients create and process their own photos or other pixel-based graphic files. Predictably, there are many things a client can get wrong, and a full discussion of these is much too big for this article. The most common errors are incorrect resolution (they should be 1.5 to two times the planned output line screen; I see more and more incredibly bad 72 dpi GIF or JPEG files from the Web included in print jobs these days), wrong colour mode (CMYK, not RGB or any other mode) or improper file format (TIFF or EPS are best).
  Other common issues are bad colour balance or contrast/density problems (improper monitor settings and calibration are the biggest culprits here, and not understanding what the density numbers in Photoshop's info palette really mean), incorrect total dot gain assumptions when processing the images (18% to 25% for sheetfed presses and 25% to 35% for web presses, depending on paper used), incorrect CMYK separation parameters for maximum black and total ink level settings, attaching an incorrect CIE/ColorSync output profile to the image or doing type effects in older versions of Photoshop (they will come out looking rough at all but the largest sizes, because pixel-based graphic files are only about one-tenth the resolution of real imageset type).
  This is a big topic in itself, and unfortunately it's difficult to determine the Photoshop settings a client might have used in any given file. The best thing I can suggest is that if a client wants to prepare his own images he should make sure he understands your exact image requirements and gets some professional prepress Photoshop training. Most Photoshop courses are taught by people who know how to create cute buttons or drop shadows but have little solid knowledge or experience in professional prepress. Find someone who does - she'll be expensive, but a day of her training can save a client or a printshop a lot of time, money and trouble.

 

Missing graphic files


  Many page layout and illustration programs allow clients to place or import graphic files - typically EPS or TIFF - into them, and these placed files should always be included with the main file when sent to the print shop or output bureau. The client should be careful to include the right version of the file used in the layout and not change the names of placed files. Which brings us to a related problem.

 

Nested graphic files


  If you place an EPS illustration file done in Illustrator or FreeHand or a pixel-based photo from Photoshop into a page layout program, the final file you create maintains a link to all the placed graphic files. It's also possible to place EPS or TIFF files into Illustrator or FreeHand now, and if you then save these files and place them into another illustration or page layout file, you're 'nesting' all these levels of placed graphics files. That should work in practice, but often causes problems, especially with older RIPs. The links get dropped, fonts get substituted or profiles get confused, and so on. Wherever possible, tell clients to avoid nesting. If they want to put an EPS logo into a new illustration file, open the logo and use cut and paste to put it into the new file, rather than using the place or import command. Also keep file names short and organize all placed files in one folder or directory.

 

Incorrect line screen


  Photoshop, Acrobat Distiller and most illustration programs allow the user to specify an output line screen in the EPS, DCS or PDF files they create, complete with dot shape, frequency and screen angles. Unless they know your requirements and understand how line screens work, this can be a big problem. It's usually best for the client to leave these settings blank and let you set them just before you output the file.

 

Setting parameters


  You'd think that few would get this wrong, but I see it all the time - people using the wrong page size, orientation, border, trim or bleed when they send a file out. Often, this is because they proofed the file on a small inkjet or laser printer and forgot to change the settings. This can result in a lot of wasted film or strange page breaks. Just make sure your staff always checks for this one. It's very easy to fix, but you have to catch it first.

 

Trapping violations


  Unless your shop uses automatic trapping software or a recent PostScript RIP that creates its own traps, you will periodically run into this problem with client files, primarily with spot or process colour illustration elements (pixel-based files rarely require trapping). Page layout programs like QuarkXPress and InDesign can be set to automatically create basic trapping, but this does not apply to graphic files imported into them, and the default auto-trap settings are not usually enough. Illustration programs like FreeHand and Illustrator allow users to manually or semi-automatically create traps, but they must know which elements need trapping and how to do it. The best thing for the print shop is to communicate the recommended trapping for its various presses to clients and encourage them to get a little training in this topic.

 

48-colour jobs


  This can be a real problem. Unless a client knows exactly what he's doing, it's quite possible to get into big trouble when defining spot or process colours. For example, they may unknowingly create custom spot colours instead of the process colour mixes they intended, winding up with a 48-colour job that would be rather expensive and time-consuming for you to output. Or they may choose spot colours or process mixes based on how they look on an uncalibrated monitor, only to be disappointed or angry when you print exactly what they specified. You should recommend that all clients use printed spot and process colour guidebooks so they know what they're likely to get. Many print shops - especially those with web and flexo presses, screen printing or other high-dot-gain systems - also hand out printed samples of popular mixes and spot colours created on their presses to give customers some good process mixes or spot-colour choices. Naturally, you'll also want your own employees to watch for those 48-colour jobs.

 

Complex clipping paths


  As RIPs get more memory and power each year, I see this less and less, but it still comes up from time to time. When creating illustration files in FreeHand, Illustrator or any other PostScript-based drawing program, it's possible to create very long and complex individual lines and paths that can cause fatal limitcheck errors, especially on older RIPs. This is particularly easy to do if they use the auto-trace tools on complex placed images or a tracing program like Adobe StreamLine. Most of the better drawing programs have a preference setting that can automatically divide overly complex paths into manageable segments, but the client needs to know how to use this feature. Remember that a file that prints without problem on a 600 dpi laser printer can often choke a 2,400 dpi imagesetter. A related problem can occur in Photoshop files saved as EPS or DCS with a clipping path to hide the background of the image - complex or multiple clipping paths in a file like this can also create RIP errors.

 

Valiant attempts


  Some clients try to create imposed multi-page printer's spreads for you, ready for output. While this is a noble sentiment, it can be an absolute disaster in practice. Unless a client knows your exact plate requirements (trim size, bleed, punch, creep, orientation, work and turn, and so on) you can waste a lot of film, plates and time, especially for impositions larger than 4-up. Trust only your most highly knowledgeable customers to do this correctly, and even then, check their work often.
  Well, that's the top 10. Another problem is the unfortunate tendency of some clients to use programs not well-suited for professional prepress, including MS Word, WordPerfect, Lotus Notes, older versions of CorelDraw, Ventura Publisher, Harvard Graphics (they're still out there!) or PC PageMaker and various accounting, database, graphing or spreadsheet programs. Images or text from these sorts of programs should probably be placed into a recent page layout program for use.
  These days, clients have the power - and responsibility - to handle the work that used to require many different well-trained graphics and prepress professionals all by themselves on a typical PC or Mac. That's a big responsibility for them, and when their files land on your doorstep you need to protect yourself and your clients from disappointment and/or cost/delivery problems. The bottom line? Have a well-thought-out electronic file submission guide done and distributed to your clients to help them. Finally, encourage them to get proper training for their people.

 

above article written by Bob Atkinson


Web site and all contents © Copyright Sharp and Company 2005, All rights reserved.

134 Park Street, PO Box 189, Rutland, Vermont 05702-0189

(802)747-4440 - FAX(802)747-4443